The Time for Change is Now

Editorial

The political landscape in Mauritius — characterised by shifting alliances and strong rivalries — is once again under public scrutiny. The very name of the current ruling coalition, Alliance du Changement, evoked hopes of a fresh beginning, a break from entrenched patterns, and a commitment to good governance. Yet, only months into its mandate, the alliance is facing growing internal pressures, rising public expectations, and the early signs of discontent. There is increasing concern that its cohesion may be under strain.

The recent exchange between Junior Minister Anishta Babooram and Minister for Gender Equality, Arianne Navarre-Marie, is a case in point. Occurring so early in the government’s term, it has raised eyebrows. Is this simply a personality clash, a momentary misalignment of perspectives? Or does it reflect a deeper challenge in reconciling distinct political identities within the coalition? Beyond personalities, the incident highlights the difficulties of forging unity in a government made up of diverse traditions and political culture. If not addressed constructively, such tensions risk eroding public confidence and offering critics an opportunity to question the alliance’s ability to govern with clarity and purpose.

This episode also casts a spotlight on the coalition’s two veteran leaders — Navin Ramgoolam and Paul Bérenger. Long-time rivals, their partnership is widely seen as strategic: a calculated effort to secure political stability and preserve the relevance of their respective parties. Each brings a distinct legacy and personal motivation — Ramgoolam seeking to cement his political standing, and Bérenger, perhaps, pursuing one final opportunity to shape the country’s direction. Whether their collaboration can withstand mounting political pressures and satisfy the electorate’s expectations remains to be seen.

Public expectations are undeniably high. Key electoral promises are still pending, and areas such as the reform of the pension system have generated concern. While the government’s decision to press ahead with this reform may reflect fiscal prudence and long-term thinking, it is not without political cost. In democracies, necessary but unpopular decisions often clash with the imperative to maintain public support. The risk here is that the electorate, facing short-term discomfort, may not wait for promised long-term benefits — placing future electoral prospects in jeopardy.

Adding to the sense of impatience is the perceived slow pace of implementation of major projects and reforms. While it is unrealistic to expect transformative change within months — given the complexity of legal and institutional frameworks — this nuance is often lost on a public seeking visible action. Deputy Prime Minister Bérenger’s recent press conference, particularly his remarks on Air Mauritius and energy, suggests that even within government, there is a desire to accelerate progress. It is essential for the government to clearly explain delays and manage expectations. Otherwise, public dissatisfaction risks hardening into disillusionment.

More recently, changes in fiscal policy have sparked further debate. The decision to maintain corporate tax levels and introduce a moratorium on new taxes for real estate developments, while simultaneously implementing measures perceived as austere for vulnerable groups such as pensioners, has generated criticism. These decisions, viewed by some as favouring corporate and affluent interests, appear to stand in contrast with the alliance’s initial pledges of equity and inclusiveness. The perception of unequal burden-sharing — where some prosper while others struggle — can erode public trust and fuel social discontent.

Perhaps the most decisive test of this government’s credibility lies in its approach to corruption. Expectations surrounding the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) are considerable. After repeated warnings from the Director of Audit and a series of publicised allegations — including the recent “Missié Moustass” audio leaks — the public is rightly demanding accountability. The key issue now is whether the FCC will be given the resources and political backing to pursue cases effectively. Tackling entrenched corruption will require institutional resilience and an unequivocal commitment from the highest levels of government. The FCC’s performance will likely serve as a key indicator of whether the promises of good governance were rhetorical or real.

Ultimately, however, much will depend on economic realities. For most citizens, principles of fairness and good governance matter — but they are filtered through the daily experience of earning a living, securing employment, and coping with rising costs. The broader global context is not favourable, with external uncertainties — including unpredictable shifts in U.S. policy — affecting key Mauritian export markets. The question many are asking is: when will signs of a meaningful economic recovery emerge? The answer will depend not just on sound policy, but on leadership marked by clarity, discipline, and consistency. In the absence of concrete progress, public patience may wane.

In conclusion, the coming months will be crucial. The electorate is watching closely, hopeful but also increasingly sceptical. Whether this period marks a real turning point or merely a rebranding of old dynamics will depend on the government’s ability to listen, adapt, and deliver. The road ahead is challenging, but not insurmountable. What is needed is focus, honesty, and a renewed commitment to the principles that brought the Alliance du Changement to power.

The time for change is indeed now — but it must be real, responsible, and results-driven.

Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 8 August 2025