The MIC and Pension Reform: A Test of Political Will
Editorial
The recent public discord at the Bank of Mauritius (BOM), sparked by a public feud between its Governor, Rama Sithanen, and former Second Deputy Governor, Gerard Sanspeur, has cast a poor light on the current government’s image. While this unprecedented conflict may have inadvertently diverted public attention from the MSM’s past transgressions, the resulting damage to the government’s reputation is undeniable. The Prime Minister’s decision to relieve Sanspeur of his post was likely an attempt to contain the fallout, but Sanspeur’s persistent actions — including official complaints to the Financial Crimes Commission (FSC) — signal that the crisis is far from over. This episode, however, is a mere symptom of a deeper malaise, a struggle between private interests and the public good that is also playing out on a grander scale in the form of two critical national debates: the fate of the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC) and the future of our welfare state.
The MIC: A Test of Public Interest
The controversy surrounding the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC) is the litmus test for the government’s commitment to prioritizing the public interest. The MIC was created in a moment of crisis to provide assistance to “distressed companies” during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, its operations have since been conducted with a lack of transparency,and this has raised concerns about accountability. An independent and thorough forensic audit is not just a desirable measure; it is an absolute necessity.
As economist and investment analyst Sameer Sharma compellingly argues in this week’s interview, the MIC’s portfolio is likely “loaded with mispriced, overvalued, and even some toxic assets.” To safeguard Mauritius’s financial stability, He argues that a three-step plan is essential:
- A True Forensic Audit: This must be conducted by a global leader in the field, not a local firm. A company like Alvarez & Marsal (A&M), which has a track record of navigating major financial crises — from the collapse of Lehman Brothers to Puerto Rico’s debt restructuring — possesses the caliber of expertise required. This is not a simple accounting exercise; it is a meticulous examination to ensure transparency, prevent the misuse of public funds, and restore trust.
- Engage a Specialist Investment Bank: Once the audit is complete, the BOM needs a top-tier investment bank with a dedicated Financial Sponsors Group (FSG). These elite global institutions have the expertise and networks to structure asset sales, manage divestments, and maximize value in illiquid markets. Their involvement is crucial to insulating the process from political interference and ensuring valuations are rigorous and independent.
- Consider Specialized Alternative Advisors: For complex assets like airlines or infrastructure, the involvement of specialized asset managers like Macquarie or Brookfield is necessary. They can provide the expert guidance needed to reposition and sell these assets, ensuring the best possible outcome.
While bringing in world-class professionals will incur costs, the price of inaction — or worse, amateurism — is far higher. The recent figures on recovered funds, which include non-disbursed amounts, are a deceptive misrepresentation. A credible forensic audit and a professional disposal plan are the only way to clean up the BOM’s balance sheet, protect the country’s financial future, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to public accountability.
The Future of the Welfare State: Transformation, Not Abandonment
Just as urgent as the MIC issue is the ongoing debate about pension reform and the future of Mauritius’s welfare state. The government’s decision to increase the pensionable age has been met with significant public discontent, raising questions about whether other, more equitable options were considered. As Sharma suggests, this issue is part of a larger global battle over the welfare state, a battle that is likely to intensify in the coming years.
It is a fundamental misconception to believe that Mauritius must choose between fiscal stability and social protection, he says. The real issue is not the welfare state’s affordability but the allocation of national resources and political inertia. A well-designed programme of market-oriented reforms — including privatising inefficient state-owned enterprises, developing local capital markets, and rationalising public spending — can not only enhance economic growth but also ensure the long-term viability of the welfare system.
The true obstacle to progress lies with policymakers who are unwilling to undertake the structural reforms that economic realities demand. Instead of championing productivity and efficiency, they find it politically expedient to target welfare spending while leaving rent-seeking behaviours and inefficiencies unaddressed. Mauritius can, and should, preserve its welfare state, not by austerity or abandonment, but through transformation. The solution lies in a move towards transparency, efficiency, and economic openness, which would make social progress both sustainable and affordable.
A Crossroads for a Nation
Mauritius stands at a critical juncture. The path to lasting economic and social advancement requires a decisive break from the past, away from half-measures and the preservation of vested interests. The outflow of our most skilled professionals is a national tragedy. Tampering with social protections while protecting entrenched financial interests risks not only social cohesion but also political stability.
Sharma rightly says that political stability is not a given; it must be earned through policies that are not only economically sound but also socially just. This is the moment for Mauritius to embrace systemic change, empower its human capital, and inspire a new chapter of trust and prosperity. The way the government handles the MIC and pension reform will not only define its legacy but also be a moment of truth, and the time for decisive, responsible action is now.
Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 5 September 2025
An Appeal
Dear Reader
65 years ago Mauritius Times was founded with a resolve to fight for justice and fairness and the advancement of the public good. It has never deviated from this principle no matter how daunting the challenges and how costly the price it has had to pay at different times of our history.
With print journalism struggling to keep afloat due to falling advertising revenues and the wide availability of free sources of information, it is crucially important for the Mauritius Times to survive and prosper. We can only continue doing it with the support of our readers.
The best way you can support our efforts is to take a subscription or by making a recurring donation through a Standing Order to our non-profit Foundation.
Thank you.
