The Ides of April
Editorial
Politics is a cruel master that respects neither age nor past glory
The history of Mauritian politics is often written in the ink of betrayal, splintering, and the cyclical rise and fall of the “Grand Old Parties.” Yet, as we stand on the eve of Saturday, April 11, 2026, we are witnessing something far more consequential than a mere party squabble. We may be witnessing the “Waterloo” of Paul Raymond Bérenger — the man who, for over half a century, presided over the destiny of the Mouvement Militant Mauricien (MMM).
Tomorrow’s Assemblée des Délégués is not just a meeting of party faithfuls; it is a high-stakes constitutional showdown that will determine whether the “Maison Mauve” remains a national institution or collapses into a historical footnote, much like the PMSD of the late Sir Gaëtan Duval.
The Anatomy of a Rebellion
The crisis that reached a boiling point this week did not happen in a vacuum. The seeds were sown on March 20, 2026, when Paul Bérenger took the unilateral and, in hindsight, catastrophic decision to resign as Deputy Prime Minister. He cited disagreements within the Alliance du Changement, but in doing so, he miscalculated the temperature of his own parliamentary troop.
Of the 18 MPs and ministers who once looked to Bérenger as the undisputed patriarch, a staggering 15 (some counts suggest 16 of the top 18 leadership figures) have effectively staged a palace coup. Led by veterans like Rajesh Bhagwan and younger intellectuals like Reza Uteem, this “rebellious majority” has made a cold, pragmatic choice: they have chosen the stability of the government and the Alliance du Changement over the increasingly erratic leadership of the party leader.
For these MPs, the math is simple. Power resides in the Cabinet and the Assembly, not in the increasingly isolated confines of the Stanley/Rose Hill branch — recently padlocked to bar their access. By siding with Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam, they have signalled that the MMM’s future is as a collaborative governing partner, not a vehicle for Bérenger’s personal grievances or strategic “volte-faces.”
The Battle for the Delegates
In the MMM’s hierarchy, the Assemblée des Déléguésholds the “pouvoirsuprême.” While Bérenger has already found himself in a humiliating minority within the Comité Central, he had always hoped the grassroots delegates would remain his Praetorian Guard.
However, the signs are ominous. Bérenger’s announcement that he will not attend tomorrow’s assembly — citing a “fraudulent delegates list” — is the ultimate admission of weakness. It is a classic defensive manoeuvre: if you cannot win the vote, you delegitimize the process. By alleging that the party machinery he built has been “doctored,” Bérenger is essentially conceding that he no longer controls the heart of the movement.
If, as expected, the delegates side with the 15 MPs tomorrow, Bérenger’s status as “Leader” becomes purely symbolic. He will be a king without a kingdom. This Saturday will likely be remembered as the day the MMM brand was formally divorced from the Bérenger name.
The “New Party” and the Joanna Factor
At 81 years of age, Paul Bérenger is at a crossroads that would exhaust a man half his age. His plan to launch a “Nouveau MMM” or a “Vrai MMM” suggests he is aware that the legal and physical assets of the party (including the iconic La Poudrière headquarters) may soon be out of his reach.
But a fundamental question arises: Does he have the stamina to sustain a new movement? Launching a political party in Mauritius is a Herculean task requiring massive organisational infrastructure, funding, and a national network of “agents.” At 81, Bérenger’s “stamina” is no longer the infinite well it was in 1969 or 1982.
The prevailing theory in political circles is that this new party is not intended for the long haul under Paul Bérenger’s leadership, but rather as a curated inheritance for his daughter, Joanna Bérenger.
Joanna Bérenger remains the sole high-profile MP to stay by her father’s side. By breaking away to form a new, smaller, and intensely loyalist group, Paul Bérenger can purge the “rebels” and create a safe ideological space where his daughter can be anointed as the natural successor. It is a move toward dynastic preservation, ensuring that the Bérenger legacy continues, even if it is on a much smaller scale.
The PMSD Comparison: A Warning from History
The ghost of Sir Gaëtan Duval looms large over this crisis. There was a time when the PMSD was the only formidable force capable of challenging the Labour Party. However, after decades of splits, junior-partner status, and internal haemorrhaging, the PMSD was reduced to a low-key player, often found fighting for its very survival at the electoral margins.
The MMM now faces the same “PMSD-ification.” If the party splits tomorrow, we are looking at two diminished entities:
-
- The “Rebel” MMM: A group of 15 MPs who risk becoming a mere satellite in the government.
- The Bérenger MMM: A loyalist rump that may find itself relegated to a few urban strongholds, losing its national “militant” appeal and becoming a family-run enterprise.
Either way, the MMM as a “third force” or a dominant national player is dead. The era where the MMM could single-handedly dictate the terms of a coalition is over.
A New Political Order
Tomorrow’s outcome will usher in a new political order in Mauritius. For fifty years, the island’s politics was a chess match played by three men: Ramgoolam, Jugnauth, and Bérenger. With the MMM in terminal decline and Bérenger isolated, the binary nature of Mauritian politics — Labour vs. MSM — is becoming more pronounced.
The “Militant” ideology, which once promised a class-based revolution and a “New Society,” has been replaced by the cold reality of parliamentary survival. If Paul Bérenger is indeed defeated at the Assemblée des Délégués tomorrow, he will have been undone not by his traditional enemies, but by the very “militants” he spent a lifetime training.
The Curtain Falls
Paul Bérenger remains a titan of our history. His contribution to the democratic fabric of Mauritius, his rigour as a Leader of the Opposition, and his role in the 1982 “60-0” victory are indelible. But politics is a cruel master that respects neither age nor past glory.
If he boycotts tomorrow’s meeting and proceeds with a new party, he is essentially choosing a dignified retreat into a loyalist bunker over a messy fight for a party that has already moved on.
Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 10 April 2026
An Appeal
Dear Reader
65 years ago Mauritius Times was founded with a resolve to fight for justice and fairness and the advancement of the public good. It has never deviated from this principle no matter how daunting the challenges and how costly the price it has had to pay at different times of our history.
With print journalism struggling to keep afloat due to falling advertising revenues and the wide availability of free sources of information, it is crucially important for the Mauritius Times to survive and prosper. We can only continue doing it with the support of our readers.
The best way you can support our efforts is to take a subscription or by making a recurring donation through a Standing Order to our non-profit Foundation.
Thank you.
