Gen Z, Straw Hats, Scrolls, and the Ballot Box
Socratic Dialogue
By Plutonix
In the spirit of Plato’s dialogues — where timeless questions meet the anxieties of the present — this playful exchange imagines Socrates in conversation with Cephalus as they confront a very modern phenomenon: the rise of Gen Z-led protests across the globe. Set somewhere between ancient Athens and the comment section of social media, the dialogue uses humour and gentle irony to explore how youthful activism, digital coordination, and political upheaval challenge long-held assumptions about authority, leadership, and civic responsibility.
Clockwise from top left: Gen Z protests in Nepal, Indonesia, the Philippines and Madagascar.
Pic – New York Times
Setting: In a sunlit Athenian portico where marble columns meet dropped Wi-Fi signals, and the ancient art of questioning struggles bravely against an unstable internet connection.
Socrates: Good morning, Cephalus! I see you frowning at that glowing tablet as if it were a Delphic oracle that refuses to speak plainly. What troubles you?
Cephalus: Ah, Socrates, it troubles me greatly. The youths have discovered politics again.
Socrates: Discovered it? As one discovers a lost sandal?
Cephalus: Worse. They have remixed it. They protest without leaders, coordinate without town criers, and wear straw hats with skulls upon them. I do not know whether to fear them or ask them for technical support.
Socrates: Let us inquire together, then. You say they protest — what do they protest for?
Cephalus: Everything, it seems. Corruption, climate, debt, wetlands, electricity, water, social media bans, governments themselves — sometimes all before lunch.
Socrates: And are these protests effective, or are they merely loud, like a chorus of cicadas – those loud summer insects, famous for their constant buzzing – in summer?
Cephalus: Effective to a terrifying degree. In Bangladesh, students chased away a prime minister of fifteen years. In Nepal, they forced out another, replacing him with an interim government led by a former Chief Justice — a woman, no less! In Madagascar, the president fled into exile. Even Kenya’s youth made the government tear up a finance bill like a bad tragedy.
Socrates: You speak as if Zeus himself had handed smartphones to the youth.
Cephalus: Smartphones, yes — and TikTok, Discord, and Instagram. No leaders to arrest, no heads to cut off. The hydra has learned digital marketing.
Socrates: Tell me, Cephalus, is a movement without leaders truly leaderless? Or have the leaders merely learned to hide among the comments?
Cephalus: That is precisely my confusion. When I was young, revolutions had pamphlets. Now they have memes. When I look for a manifesto, I find a dancing teenager explaining corruption in fifteen seconds.
Socrates: And is that explanation false?
Cephalus: Annoyingly, no.
Socrates: Then perhaps the youths have discovered a new form of rhetoric — one that fits the attention span of an impatient city.
Cephalus: If so, it is a dangerous rhetoric. They use an anime flag — One Piece, they call it — as a symbol of rebellion which they used in Indonesia, Nepal, and the Philippines. Pirates! In my day, pirates were criminals, not political philosophers.
Socrates: But pirates, Cephalus, also rejected empires, questioned authority, and shared the spoils more equally than many respectable governments.
Cephalus: Socrates, please do not defend pirates.
Socrates: I defend inquiry, not piracy. Tell me: if a symbol unites youths in Indonesia, Nepal, and the Philippines against what they call “oppressive systems,” is the problem the symbol — or the systems?
Cephalus: You always do this. I complain, and you turn my complaint into a mirror.
Socrates: A polished mirror, I hope. Now, you said these protests have reshaped the world in 2025. What do you fear will happen next?
Cephalus: That they will move from the streets to the ballot box. Imagine it, Socrates: people who learned politics on TikTok now writing laws.
Socrates: And did you learn politics from wiser sources?
Cephalus: From elders.
Socrates: And were all elders wise?
Cephalus: …No.
Socrates: Then perhaps the question is not where one learns politics, but whether one learns it well.
Cephalus: Very clever. But consider Mauritius. We have not had governments toppled by dancing protests. Yet our youths now argue endlessly online about wetlands, transparency, and meritocracy. They want “a seat at the table.”
Socrates: Do you begrudge them the chair?
Cephalus: I worry they will rearrange the furniture.
Socrates: Furniture, like constitutions, occasionally needs rearranging to avoid collapse. You mentioned 2026. What is foretold for that year?
Cephalus: Elections everywhere — Nepal, Peru, Morocco. Gen Z candidates in record numbers. Former protestors becoming ministers. Imagine chanting in the street one year and negotiating budgets the next.
Socrates: Is that not the very test of justice? To move from shouting “This is wrong!” to asking “What should replace it?”
Cephalus: Ah, but there lies the problem. These movements are leaderless. When it is time to write policy, who holds the pen?
Socrates: Perhaps many hands, each correcting the other.
Cephalus: Or smudging the ink until nothing is legible.
Socrates: That is a fair concern. Tell me, Cephalus, do governments ever smear their own ink?
Cephalus: Constantly.
Socrates: Then the youths face not a unique problem, but a familiar one. Yet you also mentioned something more radical — debt strikes and climate lawsuits.
Cephalus: Yes! They claim the debts and environmental damage of previous generations are an “illegal burden” placed upon them. They speak as if time itself were a corrupt accountant.
Socrates: An interesting argument. If a father spends recklessly and leaves his child a mountain of debt, do we praise the inheritance?
Cephalus: No, but neither do we usually sue the father’s ghost.
Socrates: Perhaps the youths are less interested in haunting than in preventing repetition. If they protest debt, what do they value?
Cephalus: Sustainability, I suppose.
Socrates: And if they protest climate destruction?
Cephalus: Survival.
Socrates: These seem reasonable concerns for mortals.
Cephalus: You make them sound noble. Still, I cannot shake the feeling that something is upside down. The young teach, the old scroll. The flag of rebellion comes from a cartoon. Revolutions organize on apps designed for cat videos.
Socrates: Cephalus, when I was young, elders complained that writing itself would ruin memory. Now you complain that short videos will ruin politics. Perhaps every age believes the next one communicates incorrectly.
Cephalus: Are you saying I should simply accept this “Gen Z Activist Year” as fate?
Socrates: Not fate — participation. The youths demand accountability, meritocracy, and transparency. These are not youthful vices; they are neglected virtues.
Cephalus: And what of disinformation? Governments will weaponise social media, you know. Lies travel faster than truth.
Socrates: Lies have always been swift; only their sandals have changed. The task of philosophy — and citizenship — is to slow down, question, and examine. Perhaps Gen Z’s greatest test in 2026 will be whether they can doubt their own feeds.
Cephalus: That would indeed be revolutionary.
Socrates: So, Cephalus, let us conclude. Are the Gen Z protests merely chaos, or are they a painful birth of a new political form?
Cephalus: After speaking with you, I reluctantly admit they may be both.
Socrates: As all births are — messy, loud, and full of alarming fluids.
Cephalus: Socrates!
Socrates: Forgive me. Even philosophers must be humorous. Now, shall we watch this TikTok you keep scowling at?
Cephalus: Very well. But if I start wearing a straw hat, promise me an intervention.
Socrates: I promise only to ask you why — and whether the skull means justice or merely good branding.
They lean over the glowing screen together, the old and the young meeting not in the streets, but in questions.
Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 31 December 2025
An Appeal
Dear Reader
65 years ago Mauritius Times was founded with a resolve to fight for justice and fairness and the advancement of the public good. It has never deviated from this principle no matter how daunting the challenges and how costly the price it has had to pay at different times of our history.
With print journalism struggling to keep afloat due to falling advertising revenues and the wide availability of free sources of information, it is crucially important for the Mauritius Times to survive and prosper. We can only continue doing it with the support of our readers.
The best way you can support our efforts is to take a subscription or by making a recurring donation through a Standing Order to our non-profit Foundation.
Thank you.
