![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/The-Conversation-e1535448713758.jpg?resize=137%2C14&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
What does genuine economic progress look like? The orthodox answer is that a bigger economy is always better, but this idea is increasingly strained by the knowledge that, on a finite planet, the economy can\u2019t grow for ever.<\/span><\/p>\n A ‘Addicted to Growth’\u00a0conference in Sydney explored how to move beyond growth economics and towards a \u201csteady-state\u201d economy.<\/span><\/p>\n But what is a steady-state economy? Why it is it desirable or necessary? And what would it be like to live in?<\/span><\/p>\n Degrowth to a steady-state economy<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The idea of the steady-state economy presents us with an alternative. This term is somewhat misleading, however, because it suggests that we simply need to maintain the size of the existing economy and stop seeking further growth.<\/span><\/p>\n But given the extent of ecological overshoot \u2013 and bearing in mind that the poorest nations still need some room to develop their economies and allow the poorest billions to attain a dignified level of existence \u2013 the transition will require the richest nations to downscale radically their resource and energy demands.<\/span><\/p>\n This realisation has given rise to calls for economic \u201cdegrowth\u201d. To be distinguished from recession, degrowth means a phase of planned and equitable economic contraction in the richest nations, eventually reaching a steady state that operates within Earth\u2019s biophysical limits.<\/span><\/p>\n At this point, mainstream economists will accuse degrowth advocates of misunderstanding the potential of technology, markets, and efficiency gains to \u201cdecouple\u201d economic growth from environmental impact. But there is no misunderstanding here. Everyone knows that we could produce and consume more efficiently than we do today. The problem is that efficiency without sufficiency is lost.<\/span><\/p>\n Despite decades of extraordinary technological advancement and huge efficiency improvements, the energy and resource demands of the global economy are still increasing. This is because within a growth-orientated economy, efficiency gains tend to be reinvested in more consumption and more growth, rather than in reducing impact.<\/span><\/p>\n This is the defining, critical flaw in growth economics: the false assumption that all economies across the globe can continue growing while radically reducing environmental impact to a sustainable level. The extent of decoupling required is simply too great. As we try unsuccessfully to \u201cgreen\u201d capitalism, we see the face of Gaia vanishing.<\/span><\/p>\n The very lifestyles that were once considered the definition of success are now proving to be our greatest failure. Attempting to universalise affluence would be catastrophic. There is absolutely no way that today\u2019s 7.2 billion people could live the Western way of life, let alone the 11 billion expected in the future. Genuine progress now lies beyond growth. Tinkering around the edges of capitalism will not cut it.<\/span><\/p>\n We need an alternative.<\/span><\/p>\n Enough for everyone, forever<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n When one first hears calls for degrowth, it is easy to think that this new economic vision must be about hardship and deprivation; that it means going back to the stone age, resigning ourselves to a stagnant culture, or being anti-progress. Not so.<\/span><\/p>\n Degrowth would liberate us from the burden of pursuing material excess. We simply don\u2019t need so much stuff \u2013 certainly not if it comes at the cost of planetary health, social justice, and personal well-being. Consumerism is a gross failure of imagination, a debilitating addiction that degrades nature and doesn\u2019t even satisfy the universal human craving for meaning.<\/span><\/p>\n Degrowth, by contrast, would involve embracing what has been termed the \u201csimpler way\u201d \u2013 producing and consuming less.<\/span><\/p>\n This would be a way of life based on modest material and energy needs but nevertheless rich in other dimensions \u2013 a life of frugal abundance. It is about creating an economy based on sufficiency, knowing how much is enough to live well, and discovering that enough is plenty.<\/span><\/p>\n The lifestyle implications of degrowth and sufficiency are far more radical than the \u201clight green\u201d forms of sustainable consumption that are widely discussed today. Turning off the lights, taking shorter showers, and recycling are all necessary parts of what sustainability will require of us, but these measures are far from enough.<\/span><\/p>\n But this does not mean we must live a life of painful sacrifice. Most of our basic needs can be met in quite simple and low-impact ways, while maintaining a high quality of life.<\/span><\/p>\n What would life be like in a degrowth society?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n In a degrowth society we would aspire to localise our economies as far and as appropriately as possible. This would assist with reducing carbon-intensive global trade, while also building resilience in the face of an uncertain and turbulent future.<\/span><\/p>\n Through forms of direct or participatory democracy we would organise our economies to ensure that everyone\u2019s basic needs are met, and then redirect our energies away from economic expansion. This would be a relatively low-energy mode of living that ran primarily on renewable energy systems.<\/span><\/p>\n Renewable energy cannot sustain an energy-intensive global society of high-end consumers. A degrowth society embraces the necessity of \u201cenergy descent\u201d, turning our energy crises into an opportunity for civilisational renewal.<\/span><\/p>\n We would tend to reduce our working hours in the formal economy in exchange for more home-production and leisure. We would have less income, but more freedom. Thus, in our simplicity, we would be rich.<\/span><\/p>\n Wherever possible, we would grow our own organic food, water our gardens with water tanks, and turn our neighbourhoods into edible landscapes as the Cubans have done in Havana. As my friend Adam Grubb so delightfully declares, we should \u201ceat the suburbs\u201d, while supplementing urban agriculture with food from local farmers\u2019 markets.<\/span><\/p>\n We do not need to purchase so many new clothes. Let us mend or exchange the clothes we have, buy second-hand, or make our own. In a degrowth society, the fashion and marketing industries would quickly wither away. A new aesthetic of sufficiency would develop, where we creatively re-use and refashion the vast existing stock of clothing and materials, and explore less impactful ways of producing new clothes.<\/span><\/p>\n We would become radical recyclers and do-it-yourself experts. This would partly be driven by the fact that we would simply be living in an era of relative scarcity, with reduced discretionary income.<\/span><\/p>\n But human beings find creative projects fulfilling, and the challenge of building the new world within the shell of the old promises to be immensely meaningful, even if it will also entail times of trial. The apparent scarcity of goods can also be greatly reduced by scaling up the sharing economy, which would also enrich our communities.<\/span><\/p>\n One day, we might even live in cob houses that we build ourselves, but over the next few critical decades the fact is that most of us will be living within the poorly designed urban infrastructure that already exists. We are hardly going to knock it all down and start again.<\/span><\/p>\n Instead, we must \u2018retrofit the suburbs\u2019, as leading permaculturalist David Holmgren argues. This would involve doing everything we can to make our homes more energy-efficient, more productive, and probably more densely inhabited.<\/span><\/p>\n This is not the eco-future that we are shown in glossy design magazines featuring million-dollar \u201cgreen homes\u201d that are prohibitively expensive.<\/span><\/p>\n Degrowth offers a more humble \u2013 and I would say more realistic \u2013 vision of a sustainable future.<\/span><\/p>\n Samuel Alexander<\/strong><\/span> Mauritius Times ePaper Friday 14 October 2022<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" and why you might actually enjoy it<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":139,"featured_media":35835,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[35201,7612,3077,4660,35204,35203,35202,29705],"class_list":["post-35834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","tag-ecological-footprint","tag-economic-development","tag-economic-growth","tag-economics","tag-long-read","tag-longreads","tag-planetary-resources","tag-sustainability"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/eco.jpg?fit=1200%2C801&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8QzSF-9jY","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/139"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35834\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/eco.jpg?resize=640%2C427&ssl=1\")
Time to get off the economic growth train?\u00a0Sergey Nivens\/Shutterstock<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mauritiustimes.com\/mt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/eco-2.jpg?resize=640%2C427&ssl=1\")
Do we really need to buy all this stuff anyway?<\/span>\u00a0Radu Bercan\/Shutterstock<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nResearch fellow, Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, <\/span>
\nThe University of Melbourne<\/span><\/p>\n
\n