|
Readers’
Response / Letters
‘The
Week in Review’: Nice job!
I
was doing Google News search on the Indian probe that just
landed on the moon and the article ‘Billions around the
world welcome Barack Obama’ by Paramanand Soobarah turned
up.
I
enjoyed the article very much. The writer did an
excellent job of giving recent events a historical
prospective. Very well written. The US media seems to think
the world began around 1970, and didn't really get going
until Brad Pitt left Jennifer Aniston.
I
am an American living in Michigan. There have been many
people in my family in the Navy, at least one of whom was
stationed at Diego Garcia. I am sorry to say I did not know
it was owned by the Mauritius. Hopefully the new US
administration will work out a new treaty covering our base
there. I am sorry to say that all I know about the Mauritius
is what I read in a novel by Patrick O'Brien about the
fighting there during the Napoleonic war.
I
would like to comment on the remarks made about the US
automobile industry. First I am impressed that the author
knows about what is happening with the industry as many US
citizens have no clue. I have worked for automotive
companies for over 20 years now. It's hard to blame them for
making SUVs as that is what the Americans were buying. If
they didn't make them the people here would have just bought
those from the Japanese and Korean companies. But I
completely agree that we/they should have been foresighted
enough to know that the SUV boom couldn't last. They had a
pilot group of electric cars around 2003 and completely
scrapped the program for no reason that I could understand.
So
again, I am happy that the Google News search engine gave me
the opportunity to read the article. Nice job!
Bill
Rudd
Michigan, USA
mrohlee@aol.com
P.
Soobarah’s comments: I
thank Mr Rudd for his complimentary remarks. True, in my
article I had criticised the three auto manufacturers for
having geared their efforts towards the production of
gas-guzzling SUVs. Mr Rudd's observation that the
manufacturers gave the public what they wanted is absolutely
valid. But the manufacturers were also in a position to know
about the ill effects of releasing kilotons of CO2
and other noxious gases into the atmosphere daily, leading
as it does to atmospheric pollution and climate change.
Conscientious marketing ought not to indulge in pushing
toxic products, like dangerous toys for babies or
gas-guzzling SUVs for adults. Here is what New York Times
columnist Thomas Friedman, whose opinions carry weight
around the world, recently had to say about the American
auto industry:
"...instead
of focusing on making money by innovating around fuel
efficiency, productivity and design, G.M. threw way too much
energy into lobbying and manoeuvring to protect its gas
guzzlers.
“This
included striking special deals with Congress that allowed
the Detroit automakers to count the mileage of gas guzzlers
as being less than they really were — provided they made
some cars flex-fuel capable for ethanol. It included special
offers of $1.99-a-gallon gasoline for a year to any customer
who purchased a gas guzzler. And it included endless
lobbying to block Congress from raising the miles-per-gallon
requirements. The result was an industry that became brain
dead.
“Nothing
typified this more than statements like those of Bob Lutz,
G.M.’s vice chairman. He has been quoted as saying that
hybrids like the Toyota Prius ‘make no economic sense.’
And, in February, D Magazine of Dallas quoted him as saying
that global warming ‘is a total crock of [expletive].’
“These
are the guys taxpayers are being asked to bail out."
(New York Times, 12 November 2008).
About
Diego Garcia, a short footnote has been added to the online
version of my article explaining, for the benefit of
American readers, that it was the British and not the
Americans who excised the Chagos Archipelago from the
territory of Mauritius just prior to granting us
Independence, in violation of UN resolutions on the matter.
Diego
Garcia: A New Mindset
I
am in full and unconditional agreement with Mr Soobarah’s
suggestion (MT 14-Nov-08) that we should follow in the
footsteps of the Marshal Islands and negotiate to lease (for
money) Diego Garcia to the US. In view of US defence needs
and its absolute necessity to keep a base on the atoll, this
seems to be a very sensible solution.
For
inspiration, we only have to look at what Makarios had done
in Cyprus. This island state got its independence from
Britain in 1960. But, because of its strategic location in
the Mediterranean to British defence interests, Akrotiri and
Dhekelia -- 3 percent of the island’s land area of 9,250
sq.Km -- were excised from the territory and remain
Sovereign British Areas (SBAs) to this day. In return, the
Cypriot government gets a rent, some 7,000 jobs, income from
the provision of goods/services to the 3,000 British troops
stationed on these bases and a lot of good-will investment
from private Britishers. No wonder, then, that Greek
Cypriots enjoy a per capita income of USD 27k—that is 2.50
times the USD 11k pertaining to Mauritians.
Ever
since our independence in 1968, every PM has been going
purple in the face at the UN General Assembly, boringly
chanting the same refrain year in, year out. “Rane nou
nou Diego,” may sound a fine tune to the gallery back
home, but does not square up with global geopolitical
reality. Forget the biblical parable about little David
defeating the giant Goliath. The US are simply too powerful
to be bothered by the small gnat that we represent in the
global context, notwithstanding the (self-proclaimed) title
of “Tiger of the Indian Ocean.” To expect them to give
up Diego Garcia because we want them to is
nothing short of a naïve display of extreme
ridicule.
So,
let us not tarry any longer and go for a negotiated
agreement for Diego to become a SBA equivalent, in return
for a reasonable rent (preferably applied retrospectively)
and much needed jobs. It is time we faced reality, changed
the scratched record and played a new tune.
TD
Fuego
Sodnac
Concerts
de DJs au Lakepoint, Curepipe
A
travers cet article, nous, habitants des rues résidentielles
proches du centre-ville de Curepipe, faisons un pressant
appel au nouveau ministre de l’Environnement, au
Commissaire de Police, au Town Clerk de la Municipalité de
Curepipe, ainsi qu’aux autres responsables
d’institutions relevant de la protection de
l’Environnement, afin de résoudre un sérieux problème
environnemental qui nous touche.
Depuis
fin 2007, plusieurs soirées et d’autres concerts de DJs
sont organisés régulièrement dans la salle qui abritait
autrefois la patinoire du Lakepoint, à Curepipe. Ces soirées
dansantes et concerts techno, se jouent à fond la caisse,
avec une basse rapide et assourdissante qui nous empêche de
trouver sommeil, spécialement entre 23 heures et 4 heures
du matin, sans oublier les jeux de lumières qui sont projetés
partout dans la ville. Il semble donc que cette salle du
Lakepoint ne dispose pas d’un système d’insonorisation
comme dans d’autres discothèques.
Plusieurs
d’entre nous avons essayé de contacter les autorités,
comme la police, pour leur demander de transmettre la requête
aux organisateurs de faire doter la salle du Lakepoint
d’un système qui filtrerait les décibels et permettrait
aux Curepipiens de dormir tranquillement. Nous leur avons
aussi demandé de s’assurer que les organisateurs de tels
événements règlent leur sono pour ne pas gêner les
habitants.
Mais
à chaque fois, nous nous sommes heurtés à des murs
d’indifférence. Les policiers de service nous demandent
de venir faire des dépositions officielles, tout en nous
disant avec désinvolture que ce problème concerne la
Police de l’Environnement uniquement et aussi la
Municipalité de Curepipe, qui délivre les permis pour
concerts, et qu’eux, policiers de la force régulière ne
veulent pas se ‘mouiller’. Nous sommes évidemment choqués
par une telle attitude de ces policiers de la station de
Curepipe. Espérons que le Commissaire Rampersad prendra
note, lui qui avait déclaré que tous les policiers,
qu’ils soient de l’Environnement, du Tourisme, etc.,
sont appelés à faire respecter la loi et à aider tous les
citoyens, indistinctement.
Lorsque
quelques-uns parmi nous parviennent à contacter quelqu’un
de cette fameuse Police de l’Environnement, qui,
semble-t-il, opère seulement de 10 heures à 15 heures,
l’on nous répond que la Loi ne prévoit rien dans de tels
cas, et qu’ils n’ont aucun pouvoir pour demander aux
organisateurs ou à qui que ce soit de faire baisser leur
sono pendant la nuit! Ceux postés à cette Police de
L’Environnement affirment aussi que la Loi ne prévoit
rien sur le contrôle des décibels. Cela est vraiment très
navrant, et l’on se demande aussi pourquoi et comment les
législateurs tardent à trouver une solution au problème
de la pollution sonore.
En
parlant de ce grave problème environnemental que représente
la pollution sonore et qui semble “overlooked” par les
autorités, nous voulons également attirer l’attention
des autorités sur le danger des pétards et autres fusettes
qui sont de plus en plus utilisés par les Mauriciens en
n’importe quelle occasion: victoire de leur équipe de
football, Noël, Nouvel An, Shankranti, Nouvel An Chinois,
et depuis quelques années, ils sont de plus en plus
nombreux, ceux qui font sonner des pétards jusqu’à 1
heure du matin lors de la fête de Divali.
Là
également, il est impératif d’apporter une réglementation,
car les gens ne peuvent se permettre de ne pas respecter
autrui, en se donnant à cœur joie avec des pétarades. Il
faudrait également réglementer sur le lieu où l’on peut
sonner des pétards, car en zones résidentielles et dans de
petits espaces, il y a un grave danger physique et même
risques de conflits entre voisins.
Si
l’on veut d’une vraie Maurice Ile Durable, il faut bien
prendre soin de nos tympans aussi.
Des
Curepipiens
The Law of the
Jungle at Port Louis
I was really shocked by
press reports of a recent incident that took place in front
of the Municipality of Port Louis. The Lord Mayor of Port
Louis was actually manhandled by street hawkers and
stallholders. The reason for their fury was that they had
been driven away from the Farquar Street. This action had
been taken following a court order in favour of the Market
Traders' Association prohibiting hawkers from operating
within a range of 500 metres from the Central Market.
I cannot but feel sorry for
the Lord Mayor for he is in no way responsible for this
situation. He took office barely a year ago and previous
administrations merely failed in their task and turned a
blind eye to this situation. The result was that hawkers
took the law in their own hands and set up business wherever
they wanted unmindful of rules and regulations. And this
resulted in a big mess that was left to the new Lord Mayor
to clean up.
And now what next? What is
going to happen is simple: the situation on the streets of
Port Louis is going to worsen. For the problem at Farquar
Street is only the tip of the iceberg. What is going on at
Desforges Street is worse and threatens to blow up anytime.
This main street of Port Louis is a real jungle. Piles of
goods on the pavements, vending stalls on the road and on
the pavement with barely enough space for the public and the
traffic. And this is getting worse day by day.
The Lord Mayor will have
lots of trouble ahead. For the problem is that he cannot
rely on the support of most of his colleagues who for
various reasons are siding with the street vendors. So, cry
my beloved city.
P. THAK
Port Louis
|