ONLINE ISSUE No: 316

Friday 09 May 2008

Contact Us

 

EXPLORE

Write to the Editor

mtimes@intnet.mu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Founded in 1954 by Beekrumsingh Ramlallah

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
"The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave."
-- Patrick Henry

 

 

Points To Ponder

May Day Antics

A First Point: What have we understood and learnt from the 1st of May meetings of the various political parties? The Social Alliance says that it has managed the economy well and it has been possible for the country to attract huge foreign direct investments. The MMM boasts that it is the strongest political party of the country, but maybe not as strong as it was on the eve of the last general election, simply because the MSM was then its ally. The MSM says that people must wait till September and then see what Sir Anerood Jugnauth can do for the party.

The Social Alliance has defended its performance in government to start with, and as a side dish, it has hit hard at the MMM, the main opposition party. It is fully satisfied with the attendance at its meeting as well as with the enthusiasm shown by the people. Have the leaders been saying that they are fully satisfied merely as an exercise of political propaganda or have they been really satisfied? It seems that they have really been satisfied. The reason seems to be that though the country is going through some very difficult times, yet the Social Alliance could attract such a huge and enthusiastic crowd. It is a fact that political commentators were not expecting that such a big crowd would attend the party’s meeting.

The Social Alliance is made up of the Labour Party, the PMXD, the party of Rama Valayden and the party of Anil Baichoo. They openly participated in both organising the meeting and actually taking part in it.

The MMM conducted its meeting on the supposed shortcomings of the Social Alliance and on the Alliance itself. I wonder what would have been the theme of the meeting of the MMM if there would have been no Social Alliance. The MMM also is satisfied with the attendance at its meeting. I know some people said openly that they were at the meeting of the MMM before moving on to that of Jocelyn Grégoire. Before his meeting, Paul Bérenger was violently critical of Jocelyn Grégoire; thereafter the same Paul Bérenger was all praise for him.

Is it that Paul Bérenger has realized, at last, that the followers of Jocelyn Grégoire are in fact his followers as well and therefore he cannot antagonize Jocelyn Grégoire? Have the followers of Paul Bérenger helped Jocelyn Grégoire and vice-versa? Time will tell. Why has Bérenger had a change of heart towards Jocelyn Grégoire in such a short length of time?

The MMM says that it was alone for the 1st of May against so many on the other side. But we know that Ashock Jugnauth, Madun Dulloo, Dinesh Ramjuttun, Raj Dayal and others helped the MMM and yet they remained behind the scene. I wonder why? Are they only worthy of working for Paul Bérenger as his stooge and for the MMM? This reminds me of a story of a slave and his master. These people will have to answer to the electorate that has made of them the politicians that they are or claim to be.

What is happening to and in the MSM? This party came up with one new idea, and this concerns the role that Sir Anerood Jugnauth will play when he will no longer be the President of the Republic in September next. The MSM gave us the impression that the meeting was essentially on Sir Anerood Jugnauth, on what he has done and how people are still thinking of him as the Prime Minister and especially what political action he will take in the future. I find this part of the meeting of the MSM to be against the President of the Republic and his name should in no circumstance have been dragged in a public political meeting.

The MSM should be the first party to know and understand that the President of the Republic acts in the name of the country and of all its inhabitants, whatever be their political conviction. I have always been for a President who has no affiliation with any political party and I still believe that Sir Anerood Jugnauth is keeping himself away from party politics now and will do so in the future. I do not think that the MSM has had his consent for using his name at the meeting. Anyway, the MSM is satisfied with the attendance at its meeting, taking into consideration that the meeting was held in the centre of Port Louis.

How many persons each of the respective parties attracted at its meeting? It is difficult for me to say. But this much I can say, which is that I am confirmed in my opinion who are the racists among the journalists.  

PM : Why not Cuttaree, Ganoo, Jeeha, Guness… ?

A Second Point: Pravind Jugnauth put at stake his future political career when he came up with the idea that Paul Bérenger could not aspire to be the candidate for the post of Prime Minister at the next general election if they were to fight the election as an alliance. He had his own reasons for coming to this conclusion, but we know that this was the main reason for the break-up of the strong alliance which had, up to that time, existed between the MSM and the MMM. Ashock Jugnauth was called by Paul Bérenger and was told that he had the capacity to be the Prime Minister but since then he is nowhere to be seen. Was Pravind Jugnauth right to come to such a conclusion about Paul Bérenger?

We must remember that Pravind Jugnauth was at one time the main defender of Paul Bérenger outside the MMM. However, people say that Pravind Jugnauth has been over-ambitious for his experience and capacity and that his opinion of Paul Bérenger is clouded by his perverted opinion.

If Pravind Jugnauth cannot accept that Paul Bérenger is the most likely candidate for the post of Prime Minister, let us consider the views of one or two other persons.

Let us start with the views of Sylvio Michel, the leader of the party Les Verts Fraternels. He is of the Creole community and he was among the first leaders who started defending the rights of his community in a systematic manner. He is still doing so, and at the moment with a certain degree of success.

He has said that Paul Bérenger cannot be the Prime Minister for, amongst other reasons, the Hindus are the majority community and Paul Bérenger is from the smallest group. And in a democracy, it is but reasonable that the Prime Minister should come from the majority community. What Sylvio Michel says makes good political sense.

And now let us see what Cassam Uteem has to say. He is not a newcomer in politics. He has had a long political experience, starting, if I am not mistaken, with the Comite d’Action Musulman. Then he went over to the MMM. He was elected as a Member of Parliament on several occasions and he was called upon to hold a ministerial post. He has always been very faithful to Paul Bérenger. He then was given the post of President of the Republic. Because of his sincerity towards Paul Bérenger when he says that the latter cannot be the candidate for the post of Prime Minister, we must understand that he is not talking out of some personal interest.

He says that if Paul Bérenger would be the candidate for the post of Prime Minister at the next general election, the march of Mauritius towards full nationhood would suffer a setback. That is, another candidate from the majority community must be the candidate, according to my reading. Whatever be the reason, Cassam Uteem says that Paul Bérenger should not be the candidate for the post of Prime Minister.

We can say that he would have had more to gain if he were to say that Paul Bérenger should be the candidate to the post of Prime Minister. After all, his son is a likely candidate for the MMM. So many people are voicing the same opinion, and quite a number of them are sincere followers of Paul Bérenger. But we know that most politicians prefer to listen to those who flatter them rather than those who tell them the truth.

Therefore, in the circumstances, we must ask the question: who would be the most likely candidate? We have Jayen Cuttaree, Alan Ganoo, Pradeep Jeeha, Ajay Guness, Vishnu Lutchmeenaraidoo and maybe Vijay Makhan from the MMM proper. Then we have other likely candidates in the persons of Dinesh Ramjuttun, Madun Dulloo, Raj Dayal, Ashock Jugnauth and certain others whose names I have forgotten. They are all close to Paul Bérenger, who can pick and choose anyone he prefers.

But the most likely candidate would be, other things being equal, Pravind Jugnauth. Both Pravind Jugnauth and Paul Bérenger made a good team whilst they were in government. They say that they performed well in their job and when there was no job for them, they fell out. The reason is simple: Pravind Jugnauth voiced his view that Paul Bérenger could not be the candidate for the post of Prime Minister, and that he, Pravind Jugnauth himself, should be the alliance’s nominee for the job, implying that Paul Bérenger would become his junior. This was anathema to the MMM and to Paul Bérenger as well.

Now that the idea that Paul Bérenger cannot aspire to become the next Prime Minister is gaining ground, the chances of Pravind Jugnauth’s being the next MMM-MSM prime ministerial candidate are getting better and better. Is this not what Pravind Jugnauth always wanted? Well, let us wait for events to unfold in front of our eyes. Only then can we be sure.

Food Crisis: What is the govt doing about it ?

A Third Point: Believe me, the outcome of the next general election would depend essentially on the availability of rice, flour, vegetables and other items of food crops at a reasonable price. People on the lowest rung of the economic ladder must feel that they are getting their articles of daily consumption at a price that they can afford to pay.

Government says that planters should be encouraged to grow all the vegetables that we need. This is a worthwhile policy, but we must remember that our land resources are limited. At the moment, the price of sugar is such that the growing of sugar cane does not encourage the planters to continue with this cultivation. Being given the importance of sugar cane in the bio-fuel sector, it will not be surprising that its price will follow that of petrol though not to that extent. We should be prepared for that.

The acidity level of our sugar cane lands is, I have been told, very high and in the circumstances, the lands cannot be profitably cultivated with vegetables. Of course we do have other lands than the sugar cane lands to grow our vegetables on but government must be careful how our lands are going to be used. What I am trying to say is that the local lands cannot, by any stretch of our imagination, be a panacea to all our food problems.

We are expecting some very serious problems with our rice supply. India is not interested in exporting any type of rice, but more so the Basmati variety;, the same situation also prevails in Pakistan. These countries must satisfy the demands of their citizens first, and this is a reasonable policy. What are we going to do then? We know that the price of rice has gone up by between 50% to a 100% over a period of twelve months.

We cannot grow all the rice that we need on lands available here, nor are all our lands suitable for the cultivation of rice. At the same time, we must consider that the big producers of rice like Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia and maybe Thailand have decided to form a cartel for fixing the price of rice on the international market and they want to have more control on rice trade. This group would be called the Organisation of Rice Exporting Countries, that is the OREC, and it will function like the notorious OPEC, the petrol cartel. Would the price of rice rise up on the same percentage as petroleum products?

The price of flour has seen a tremendous rise during the past one year and we shall be satisfied if we can buy this commodity even at this high price from our traditional suppliers. We must remember that we have no lands to grow wheat either and that for this commodity also we must depend on our neighbouring countries.

We must seriously think of producing our own rice as well as our own flour. And as we cannot do it in Mauritius we must perforce depend either on Madagascar or Mozambique or other countries on the African mainland. And this will be to our advantage as well as to the advantage of the country putting at our disposal the land that we shall be needing.

Government must be fully involved in the project, as also the private sector. Other persons who would show some interest to join in should be welcomed. Mauritians must be told on a regular basis what is being done, because everybody is concerned about their food. When they are told what is being done, they feel that they are part of the process.

In the meantime what measures can government take?

I. Have a greater acreage of land involved under food production.

II. Increase the number of persons involved in food crop growing.

III. Do away with all duties on imported food items.

IV. Give incentives and support to persons involved in food crop growing.

V. Try to find out if we can grow other than the traditional crops normally grown here, I am thinking of soya beans, butter beans, cape beans and such crops. They can be of use to us and I am sure we can have a ready market for these items in other countries. 

In so far as I am concerned, government is taking too long to get the machinery moving, the population does not yet feel involved and the next election will be held in about two years, which is just round the corner. I am telling the politicians to mind what they are doing or not doing.

LEX

Copyright © 2005 Mauritius Times.

All rights reserved. Website designed and maintained by the  Staff of Mauritius Times.