| |
To Our
Readers
Your
views are of interest to us. They help us balance the
argument in the correct perspective. We welcome you to draw
our attention to anything or opinion expressed in the
Mauritius Times (or any national or international event of
interest) with which you agree from your own angle or
disagree due to a different appreciation of facts.
We
will gratefully receive your communications at the email
address:
mtimes@intnet.mu
We
may decide to publish your comments or the relevant parts
thereof if we consider that they will help our readers
better understand specific contexts and maintain MT as the
foremost and most balanced analytical newspaper of the
country.
Apropos
LEX’s ‘The Drug Business: How Criminals Beat The Law’
A
"serious inquiry" would reveal that the police and
anti-drug laws directly provide the profitable black markets
that attract drug dealers that will sell drugs to children.
If drugs were regulated, in age and quality controlled
markets, our children would be much safer; drug users would
not need to steal to support the black market, and the
criminals who currently run the market would be out of
business as they could not compete with a legal market.
This
is THE solution. Anything else is folly.
David Lane
615 Fair Ave
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
United States of America
*
* *
The
drug war doesn't fight crime, it fuels crime
The
U.S. drug war is a cure worse than the disease. Attempts to
limit the supply of illegal drugs while demand remains
constant only increase the profitability of drug
trafficking. For addictive drugs like heroin, a spike in
street prices leads desperate addicts to increase criminal
activity to feed desperate habits. The drug war doesn't
fight crime, it fuels crime. Drug prohibition finances
organize crime at home and terrorism abroad, which is then
used to justify more drug war spending.
There is a middle ground between drug prohibition and
legalization. Switzerland's heroin maintenance program
has been shown to reduce disease, death and crime among
chronic users.
Providing addicts with standardized doses in a clinical
setting eliminates many of the problems associated with
heroin use. Heroin maintenance pilot projects are underway
in Canada, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands.
If expanded, prescription heroin maintenance would deprive
organized crime of a core client base. This would render
illegal heroin trafficking unprofitable and spare future
generations addiction. Marijuana (cannabis) should be taxed
and regulated like alcohol, only without the ubiquitous
advertising. Separating the hard and soft drug markets is
critical.
As long as marijuana distribution is controlled by organized
crime, consumers of the most popular illicit drug will
continue to come into contact with sellers of hard drugs
like cocaine and heroin. Given that marijuana is arguably
safer than legal alcohol, it makes no sense to waste scarce
resources on failed policies that finance organized crime
and
facilitate hard drug use. Drug policy reform may send the
wrong message to children, but I like to think the children
are more important than the message.
For information on the efficacy of heroin maintenance please
read the following British Medical Journal report:
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/327/7410/310.
To learn more about Canada's heroin maintenance
research please visit:
http://www.naomistudy.ca/
Robert Sharpe, MPA
Policy
Analyst
Common Sense for Drug Policy
www.csdp.org
P.O. Box 59181
Washington, DC 20012
USA
Mauritian
politics
Mr
Dulloo has tested the water and horse-traded with almost all
major political parties in the Island. He has finally shown
his true colours. He is an MMM at heart. He really belongs
to the MMM, despite having chanted the mantras of other
parties from time to time in the past.
Mr
Dulloo broke ranks with the MMM and joined the MSM. He was
regarded by the former Prime Minister, SAJ, as “le Dauphin”. He wanted to get the upper hand and lead the
party as the potential successor of SAJ. Unfortunately, he
forgot that Mauritian politics is based on the “Indian
dynastic politics” where the son succeeds the mother and
the wife succeeds the late husband. His position within the
MSM became untenable and became some sort of a thorny
problem. He was sacked by SAJ.
In
frustration Hon Dulloo formed his own political party known
as the MMSM, in collaboration with a motley crowd. He then
joined hands with the Social Alliance and vehemently
criticised Paul Bérenger for his policies, in particular
the Illovo deal. Later, his allegedly furtive contacts with
the MMM led to his sacking by an astute Prime Minister. His
followers left him in the lurch. He became isolated and
sought any means to cling on to survive. He ultimately
subjugated himself to the command of his long-lost friend
Paul Bérenger. His adhesion to the MMM has caused a rift
within the party and left some members fuming with rage.
The
true state of the Mauritian politics will be known only when
the parties MMM and MSM or MMM and Labour will ally to fight
the general elections. Political parties will crop up like
mushrooms by disgruntled members. Former friends will become
foes, crossing swords and calling each other the worst names
under the sun. They will start instigating the electors,
preaching hate, casteism and division. Just wait and
see.
S.Seechurn
London
Partisan
advertisements?
It
is with great sadness that I have read Harish Boodhoo’s
article « The scandal surrounding the government-paid
partisan advertisements to newspapers » on le Défi
Blog, 26 July 2008, and in le Mauricien, 24
July 2008.
If
you want «the Supreme Court to give its interpretation of
the financial rules and regulations governing advertisements»
effected by the government and «Government-controlled
parastatal bodies», you should advise the aggrieved
newspapers to bring a test case, or perhaps you could bring
one yourself, in the interests of those papers. Please do
not forget to include the private sector advertisements as
well.
Taxpayers’
money must be used in the public interest and not in the
interests of privately financed papers. The notion that
money paid by taxpayers belongs to the taxpayers is a
totally misguided political claim. Tax is that amount of
money which has to be paid. Civil Servants, including
Ministers and Judges pay taxes too. But the taxpayer has no
claim upon this money simply because IT DOES NOT BELONG TO
HIM! It belongs to the State, and those who run the State
have an obligation to use this money in the public interest.
Those who say that taxpayers’ money is «our money» are
clearly misguided.
You
are wrong in believing that this « concerns public funds
being utilized by politicians for political purpose ».
According to what you are saying, if the government
advertises in le Mauricien, it is fine, but when the
same advertisement is placed in Mauritius Times, it
is for a ‘political purpose’. Do you honestly believe
that a court of law will entertain this sort of reasoning?
Those
papers which you fear may suffer the same fate as Sunday
Vani for want of advertisements from the government
because you care so much about them must be laughing at you,
which is nothing new. In fact, they obtain more than their
share of advertisement from the private sector due to their
wide readership. What did the private sector do for Sunday
Vani? In the UK, News of the World, The Sun are
regarded as forming part of the gutter press, but the
private sector spends silly millions in advertising in those
papers, again because of their wide readership.
By
the way, since when did you become the lover boy of le
Mauricien, Harish bhai, given the sheer number of your
pieces it is publishing lately? Is it as long as you
embarrass Navin Ramgoolam and the Labour Party, until they
ally with Bérenger, that is?
M
Rafic Soormally
London
Know
‘Right’ Need
Between
Right-To-Know
and
Need–To-Know, how mazy
should
Life-Space-Time be?
*
* *
To
Know Or Not…?
Shonldn’t
Franken-Dodo
et
al scan smooth, smart Homo,
all
retro-bare ?? No???
*
* *
Central-Banking
Blues
Long
well-sprung ensemble
Press’d
local: in-growing nails
Constitutional?
Jagadish
Manrakhan
Notes:
(i) With due apologies to
Martin Luther (1483 – 1546), who nailed his ’95
theses’ on the door of Wittenberg Church, Germany, on
All-Saints’ Day 1517, bringing the Reformation Movement
within Christianity into the open, to be well ventilated by
a newly invented printing press
(ii) For the unprecedented world-wide malaise in
present-day central banking, see inter alia recent
issues of The Economist, especially the leaders
entitled ‘Barbarians at the Vault’, 15th May p14;
‘What a way to run the World’, 5 July p 15; and
‘Twin Twisters; 19 July p 11
(iii) For insights into possible repercussions in
(western) democracies of security and related topics on
constitutional matters, see the International Herald
Tribune (New York Times), 9th July 08, esp:
the leader ‘Compromising the Constitution’, along
with other articles on pp 1, 8 and 9
(iv) See also the perceptive and persuasive plea of
US Senator George Mitchell ‘Hard Times Are Here’:
on free and fair trade, economic recovery growth, and
development The Times, London, 3 July 08 p 22 with
reference to the current WTO talks (now collapsed)
|